Bill and David,
Currently, the absolute jump table is not by default enabled. It can be
enabled by undocumented option "-mno-relative-jumptables". If the target
supports named sections (have_named_sections), the feature can be enabled. We
plan to enable the future by default in GCC12 and
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:09:22AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:58 AM Bill Schmidt wrote:
> And do the absolute addressing for switch tables changes work on AIX?
> I thought that Hao Chen only had done the work for PPC64 Linux ELF
> syntax with promises of future
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:58 AM Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 11/19/21 8:49 AM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > The next set of 3 patches add zero cycle move support to the Power10. Zero
> > cycle moves are where the move to LR/CTR/TAR register that is adjacent to
> > the
> > jump to
Hi!
On 11/19/21 8:49 AM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> The next set of 3 patches add zero cycle move support to the Power10. Zero
> cycle moves are where the move to LR/CTR/TAR register that is adjacent to the
> jump to LR/CTR/TAR register can be fused together.
>
> At the moment, these set of three
The next set of 3 patches add zero cycle move support to the Power10. Zero
cycle moves are where the move to LR/CTR/TAR register that is adjacent to the
jump to LR/CTR/TAR register can be fused together.
At the moment, these set of three patches add support for zero cycle moves for
indirect
