On Wed, 28 Apr 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > FAOD, as noted above will it be OK if I backport 3/3 to GCC 11 now, for
> > inclusion with 11.2?
> >
> > While not a regression fix the change is contained in the VAX backend,
> > not a mainstream one, and now it is possibly the final opportunity
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 8:19 PM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > > I think 3/3 is worth backporting to GCC 11 at one point, perhaps 11.2, so
> > > that it can be easily picked downstream, as it improves code generation
> > > with old reload and we may
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I think 3/3 is worth backporting to GCC 11 at one point, perhaps 11.2, so
> > that it can be easily picked downstream, as it improves code generation
> > with old reload and we may not have another major release still using it.
> >
> > OTOH
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 5:32 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> ...
> OTOH switching to LRA regresses code generation seriously, by making the
> indexed and indirect VAX address modes severely underutilised, so while
> with these changes in place the backend can be switched to LRA with just a
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 1:22 AM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> According to the plan discussed in the context of the recent switch to
> MODE_CC of the VAX backend I have been looking into switching the backend
> to LRA as well.
>
> It has turned out quite straightforward itself, with just
Hi,
According to the plan discussed in the context of the recent switch to
MODE_CC of the VAX backend I have been looking into switching the backend
to LRA as well.
It has turned out quite straightforward itself, with just a couple of
minor issues triggered with a flip to LRA, one causing a
