On 12/3/2021 12:53 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 3 Dec 2021, at 03:12, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/22/2021 7:49 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
Hi all, apologies for forgetting to add the cover letter.
No worries. I'd already assumed this was to support aarch64 trampolines on
darwin by having them
> On 3 Dec 2021, at 03:12, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/22/2021 7:49 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
>> Hi all, apologies for forgetting to add the cover letter.
> No worries. I'd already assumed this was to support aarch64 trampolines on
> darwin by having them live elsewere as managed
On 11/22/2021 7:49 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
Hi all, apologies for forgetting to add the cover letter.
No worries. I'd already assumed this was to support aarch64 trampolines
on darwin by having them live elsewere as managed entities.
The motivation of this work is to provide (limited)
Hi all, apologies for forgetting to add the cover letter.
The motivation of this work is to provide (limited) support for GCC
nested function trampolines on targets that do not have an executable
stack. This code has been (roughly) tested by creating several
thousand nested functions (i.e. enough
