[PATCH 0/9] Enable LRA on SH

2014-12-17 Thread Kaz Kojima
This patch series is to make SH target use LRA and is discussed in the PR target/55212: [SH] Switch to LRA https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 I think there are issues which should be solved before defaulting LRA on SH and the helps from the experts are needed. The series are cons

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Enable LRA on SH

2014-12-18 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2014-12-17 7:56 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote: This patch series is to make SH target use LRA and is discussed in the PR target/55212: [SH] Switch to LRA https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 I think there are issues which should be solved before defaulting LRA on SH and the helps from t

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Enable LRA on SH

2014-12-18 Thread Oleg Endo
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 13:42 -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH! I know it > is quite a challenge to do any RA work for this target. The R0-ness (both, GP reg r0 and FP reg fr0) of the ISA taxes the patience sometimes. Too often, I've been t

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Enable LRA on SH

2014-12-18 Thread Mike Stump
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH! I’ve ported my target to LRA, and I have not found any LRA bits I needed to change.

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Enable LRA on SH

2014-12-18 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2014-12-18 2:26 PM, Mike Stump wrote: On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH! I’ve ported my target to LRA, and I have not found any LRA bits I needed to change. Thanks, Mike. When I did a few first ports, it never