On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:13:39AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> This is another patch that looks bigger than it really is. Because we
> have a new namespace for the builtins, allowing us to have both the old
> and new builtin infrastructure supported at once, we need versions of
> these functions
Hi Will,
On 9/13/21 1:42 PM, will schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2021-09-01 at 11:13 -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
This is another patch that looks bigger than it really is. Because we
have a new namespace for the builtins, allowing us to have both the old
and new builtin infrastructure s
On Wed, 2021-09-01 at 11:13 -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This is another patch that looks bigger than it really is. Because we
> have a new namespace for the builtins, allowing us to have both the old
> and new builtin infrastructure supported at once, we need versions of
> these f
This is another patch that looks bigger than it really is. Because we
have a new namespace for the builtins, allowing us to have both the old
and new builtin infrastructure supported at once, we need versions of
these functions that use the new builtin namespace. Otherwise the code is
unchanged.
