This fixes the first part of this bug where `a ? -1 : 0`
would cause a value of 1 into the signed boolean value.
It fixes the problem by casting to an integer type of
the same size/signedness before doing the negative and
then casting to the type of expression.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_6
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 10:23 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> This fixes the first part of this bug where `a ? -1 : 0`
> would cause a value of 1 into the signed boolean value.
> It fixes the problem by casting to an integer type of
> the same size/signedness before doing the negative a
