Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: don't print () in bpf_print_operand_address

On 7/25/23 15:14, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > > Hi David. > >> Unfortunately, the pseudo-C dialect syntax used for some of the v3 >> atomic instructions clashes with unconditionally printing the >> surrounding parentheses in bpf_print_operand_address. >> >> Instead, place the parentheses in the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: don't print () in bpf_print_operand_address

Hi David. > Unfortunately, the pseudo-C dialect syntax used for some of the v3 > atomic instructions clashes with unconditionally printing the > surrounding parentheses in bpf_print_operand_address. > > Instead, place the parentheses in the output templates where needed. > > Tested in

[PATCH 1/2] bpf: don't print () in bpf_print_operand_address

Unfortunately, the pseudo-C dialect syntax used for some of the v3 atomic instructions clashes with unconditionally printing the surrounding parentheses in bpf_print_operand_address. Instead, place the parentheses in the output templates where needed. Tested in bpf-unknown-none. OK? gcc/