On 6/30/21 11:03 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/29/21 1:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
When push_access_scope is passed a TYPE_DECL for a class type (which
can happen during e.g. satisfaction), we undesirably push only the
enclosing context of the class
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/29/21 1:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > When push_access_scope is passed a TYPE_DECL for a class type (which
> > can happen during e.g. satisfaction), we undesirably push only the
> > enclosing context of the class instead of the class itself.
On 6/29/21 1:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
When push_access_scope is passed a TYPE_DECL for a class type (which
can happen during e.g. satisfaction), we undesirably push only the
enclosing context of the class instead of the class itself. This causes
us to mishandle e.g. testcase below due to us
When push_access_scope is passed a TYPE_DECL for a class type (which
can happen during e.g. satisfaction), we undesirably push only the
enclosing context of the class instead of the class itself. This causes
us to mishandle e.g. testcase below due to us not entering the scope of
A before checking
