Steven,
On 19/07/12 16:43, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> I think you should compare your method to the one described in the
>>> paper, and at least reference the paper if it's somehow similar --
>>
>> Interesting, thanks. Will do.
>
Done.
> B
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Steven" == Steven Bosscher writes:
>
> Steven> Makefile.in is a mess. One of these days, someone (hi, Tromey) will
> Steven> hopefully get annoyed enough with this again to finish some tool to
> Steven> auto-generate the dependences list. Until tha
> "Steven" == Steven Bosscher writes:
Steven> Makefile.in is a mess. One of these days, someone (hi, Tromey) will
Steven> hopefully get annoyed enough with this again to finish some tool to
Steven> auto-generate the dependences list. Until that time, let's try to
Steven> avoid proliferating t
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> I think you should compare your method to the one described in the
>> paper, and at least reference the paper if it's somehow similar --
>
> Interesting, thanks. Will do.
BTW, I have the value profiling bits for this in my implementation of
On 17/07/12 14:57, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> attached patch implements an if-to-switch conversion tree pass
>> pass_if_to_switch.
>
> Nice. I've been working on something similar, using the paper
> "Efficient and Effective Bran
On 18/07/12 23:47, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
+tree-if-switch-conversion.o : tree-if-switch-conversion.c $(CONFIG_H) \
+$(SYSTEM_H) $(TREE_H) $(TM_P_H) $(TREE_FLOW_H) $(DIAGNOSTIC_H) \
+$(TREE_INLINE_H) $(TIMEVAR_H) $(TM_H)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> +tree-if-switch-conversion.o : tree-if-switch-conversion.c $(CONFIG_H) \
>>> +$(SYSTEM_H) $(TREE_H) $(TM_P_H) $(TREE_FLOW_H) $(DIAGNOSTIC_H) \
>>> +$(TREE_INLINE_H) $(TIMEVAR_H) $(TM_H) coretypes.h $(TREE_DUMP_H) \
>>> +$(GIMPLE
Bernhard,
thanks for the review.
On 18/07/12 19:32, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:21:00PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
>> /* The root of the compilation pass tree, once constructed. */
>> extern struct opt_pass *all_passes, *all_small_ipa_passes,
>> *all_lowering
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:21:00PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> /* The root of the compilation pass tree, once constructed. */
> extern struct opt_pass *all_passes, *all_small_ipa_passes,
> *all_lowering_passes,
>Index: gcc/tree-if-switch-conversion.c
>===
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Richard,
>
> attached patch implements an if-to-switch conversion tree pass
> pass_if_to_switch.
Nice. I've been working on something similar, using the paper
"Efficient and Effective Branch Reordering Using Profile Data" (Mingui
Yang et. al.
Richard,
attached patch implements an if-to-switch conversion tree pass
pass_if_to_switch. I will follow up this email with an infrastructure patch that
provides double_int_popcount and popcount_hwi.
The pass detects chains of ifs like this:
...
:
...
if (D.1993_3 == 32)
goto ;
e
11 matches
Mail list logo
