On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 01:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and perhaps
> 14?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> This implements the changes of this C++23 paper as a DR against C++20.
It's a little unfortunate that we can't bump the __cpp_lib_ranges
macro for C+
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and perhaps
14?
-- >8 --
This implements the changes of this C++23 paper as a DR against C++20.
Note that since the later P2538R1 "ADL-proof std::projected" which we
already implement, we can't use a simple partial specialization to matc
