On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 17:29, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for the 11 branch?
> > The backport to the 10 branch hasn't been started yet, I figured it'd
> > be good to first get the 11 backpor
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for the 11 branch?
> The backport to the 10 branch hasn't been started yet, I figured it'd
> be good to first get the 11 backport right then base the 10 backport
> on the 11 one.
>
> NB: This backport of
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for the 11 branch?
> The backport to the 10 branch hasn't been started yet, I figured it'd
> be good to first get the 11 backport right then base the 10 backport
> on the 11 one.
>
> NB: This backport of
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for the 11 branch?
The backport to the 10 branch hasn't been started yet, I figured it'd
be good to first get the 11 backport right then base the 10 backport
on the 11 one.
NB: This backport of r12-1606 to the 11 branch deliberately omits parts
of P
