On 14/10/15 23:02, Charles Baylis wrote:
On 12 October 2015 at 11:58, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>
Given we are making changes here to how this all works on bigendian, have
you tested armeb at all?
I tested on big endian, and it passes, except
Well, I asked because it seemed good to make sur
On 12 October 2015 at 11:58, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 07/10/15 00:59, charles.bay...@linaro.org wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
>
> ...
>>
>> case NEON_ARG_MEMORY:
>> /* Check if expand failed. */
>>
On 07/10/15 00:59, charles.bay...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
...
case NEON_ARG_MEMORY:
/* Check if expand failed. */
if (op[argc] == const0_rtx)
{
- va_end (a
From: Charles Baylis
gcc/ChangeLog:
Charles Baylis
PR target/63870
* config/arm/arm-builtins.c (enum arm_type_qualifiers): New enumerator
qualifier_struct_load_store_lane_index.
(builtin_arg): New enumerator NEON_ARG_STRUCT_LOAD_STORE_LANE_INDEX.
(arm
