> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Vieira (lists)
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 4:39 PM
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: Fix sign of MVE predicate mve_pred16_t [PR
> 107674]
>
> Here'
] arm: Fix sign of MVE predicate mve_pred16_t [PR
107674]
On 26/01/2023 15:02, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi Andre,
-Original Message-
From: Andre Vieira (lists)
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 1:41 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm
> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Vieira (lists)
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 9:54 AM
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: Fix sign of MVE predicate mve_pred16_t [PR
> 107674]
>
>
>
On 26/01/2023 15:02, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi Andre,
-Original Message-
From: Andre Vieira (lists)
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 1:41 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm: Fix sign of MVE predicate mve_pred16_t [PR
107674
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2023 3:02 PM
> To: Andre Vieira (lists) ; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] arm: Fix sign of MVE predicate mve_pred16_t [PR
> 107674]
>
>
Hi Andre,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Vieira (lists)
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 1:41 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Richard Earnshaw
>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm: Fix sign of MVE predicate mve_pred16_t [PR
> 107674]
>
I meant bootstrapped on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and not none-eabi.
On 24/01/2023 13:40, Andre Vieira (lists) via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
The ACLE defines mve_pred16_t as an unsigned short. This patch makes
sure GCC treats the predicate as an unsigned type, rather than signed.
Bootstrapped on
Hi,
The ACLE defines mve_pred16_t as an unsigned short. This patch makes
sure GCC treats the predicate as an unsigned type, rather than signed.
Bootstrapped on aarch64-none-eabi and regression tested on arm-none-eabi
and armeb-none-eabi for armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp.
OK for trunk?
