Hi Jason,
I've attached a patch that handles parameter packs in the conversion
op. I thought it best to get this reviewed independently before rolling
up into the 'Support lambda templates' patch.
Do you think it's the right idea? It seems to work okay but I've
reworked the way the
On 09/09/2013 03:22 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:
I've attached a patch that handles parameter packs in the conversion
op. I thought it best to get this reviewed independently before rolling
up into the 'Support lambda templates' patch.
Do you think it's the right idea? It seems to work okay but
On 03.09.2013 22:25, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/03/2013 03:50 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Problem is that no RTL is set for the incoming parms in the
instantiation of the expansion. It ICEs in gimple_expand_cfg
because 'DECL_RTL_IF_SET
(var)' returns nullptr for the incoming parms resulting in a
On 05.09.2013 20:14, Adam Butcher wrote:
On 03.09.2013 22:25, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/03/2013 03:50 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Problem is that no RTL is set for the incoming parms in the
instantiation of the expansion. It ICEs in gimple_expand_cfg
because 'DECL_RTL_IF_SET
(var)' returns
On 03.09.2013 04:50, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/02/2013 05:18 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
will focus on the parameter pack stuff (when I get a chance).
Sounds good.
I had a quick hack at getting pack expansion working for the conversion
op.
The syntactic side seems to be okay. It gets all the
On 09/03/2013 03:50 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Problem is that no RTL is set for the incoming parms in the
instantiation of the expansion. It ICEs in gimple_expand_cfg because
'DECL_RTL_IF_SET
(var)' returns nullptr for the incoming parms resulting in a failed assertion
that
On 01.09.2013 21:22, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/27/2013 03:42 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
+ vec_safe_push (argvec, arg);
I bet we want convert_from_reference in the non-generic lambda case,
too.
OK with that change.
I think I had made that change originally to keep the two impls the
On 09/02/2013 02:30 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
I think I had made that change originally to keep the two impls the same
and I hit issues with non-generic lambdas. But I can't remember the
details. I'll try again. If it works with convert_from_reference in
both cases should I push or should I
On 02.09.2013 19:34, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/02/2013 02:30 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
On 01.09.2013 21:22, Jason Merrill wrote:
I bet we want convert_from_reference in the non-generic lambda
case, too.
I think I had made that change originally to keep the two impls the
same
and I hit
On 09/02/2013 05:18 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Will assume, for now, that the convert_from_reference call is not wanted
in the non-generic case (maybe something to do with using 'build_call_a'
instead of 'build_nt_call_vec' or the convert_from_reference on the call
itself?)
Ah, yes; we are
On 08/27/2013 03:42 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
+ vec_safe_push (argvec, arg);
I bet we want convert_from_reference in the non-generic lambda case, too.
OK with that change.
Jason
* parser.c (cp_parser_lambda_declarator_opt): Accept template parameter
list with std=c++1y or std=gnu++1y.
(cp_parser_lambda_body): Don't call 'expand_or_defer_fn' for lambda call
operator template to avoid adding template result to symbol table.
* lambda.c
12 matches
Mail list logo
