On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 22:58, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > It seems it's not possible to write these tests so that they works in
> > all combinations of toolchain configuration and options used for testing :-(
>
> So,
On Apr 27, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> It seems it's not possible to write these tests so that they works in
> all combinations of toolchain configuration and options used for testing :-(
So, generally, you can have each change in configuration reflected in a
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 15:55, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> Make the order in which we try -mfloat-abi options consistent with the
> other similar effective targets: try softfp first, then hard.
>
> We have new failures on arm-eabi:
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/bfloat16_scalar_1_1.c check-function-bodies
Make the order in which we try -mfloat-abi options consistent with the
other similar effective targets: try softfp first, then hard.
We have new failures on arm-eabi:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/bfloat16_scalar_1_1.c check-function-bodies stacktest1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/bfloat16_simd_1_1.c
