On 10/12/2020 18:39, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 10:58 +0100, Erick Ochoa wrote:
+ // Anonymous fields? (Which the record can be!).
+ warning (OPT_Wdfa, "RECORD_TYPE %qE has dead field %qE in LTO.\n",
+ record, field);
Others have pointed out
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 10:58 +0100, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> + // Anonymous fields? (Which the record can be!).
> + warning (OPT_Wdfa, "RECORD_TYPE %qE has dead field %qE in LTO.\n",
> + record, field);
Others have pointed out that -Wdfa isn't a good name for the
On 12/9/20 4:09 PM, Eric Gallager via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:58 AM Erick Ochoa <
erick.oc...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
This commit includes the following components:
Type-based escape analysis to determine structs that can be modified at
link-time.
Field
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:58 AM Erick Ochoa <
erick.oc...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
>
> This commit includes the following components:
>
>Type-based escape analysis to determine structs that can be modified at
>link-time.
>Field access analysis to determine which fields are never
This commit includes the following components:
Type-based escape analysis to determine structs that can be modified at
link-time.
Field access analysis to determine which fields are never read.
The type-based escape analysis provides a list of types, that are not
visible outside of the
