Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-12-08 Thread Richard Sandiford
Andrew Stubbs writes: > I finally got back to investigating this > > On 21/11/2018 01:00, Jeff Law wrote: >>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gimplefe-28.c >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gimplefe-28.c >>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >>> /* { dg-do compile { target sqrt_insn } } */ >>> -/* { dg-options "-fgi

Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-12-06 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 26/11/2018 21:13, Mike Stump wrote: On Nov 26, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote: I'll Ok the signal one, if you prefer it over a dummy signal routine. Though, would be nice for you to add signal if possible/reasonable. Oh, and my long term thinking on signal is that logically, it's f

Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-12-06 Thread Andrew Stubbs
I finally got back to investigating this On 21/11/2018 01:00, Jeff Law wrote: --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gimplefe-28.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gimplefe-28.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile { target sqrt_insn } } */ -/* { dg-options "-fgimple -O2" } */ +/* { dg-options "-fgimple -O2

Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-11-27 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 26/11/2018 21:13, Mike Stump wrote: On Nov 26, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote: I'll Ok the signal one, if you prefer it over a dummy signal routine. Though, would be nice for you to add signal if possible/reasonable. Oh, and my long term thinking on signal is that logically, it's f

Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-11-26 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 26, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > > I'll Ok the signal one, if you prefer it over a dummy signal routine. > Though, would be nice for you to add signal if possible/reasonable. Oh, and my long term thinking on signal is that logically, it's fine to have: #if __has_include("sign

Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-11-26 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 20, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 11/16/18 9:29 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: >> This collection of miscellaneous patches configures the testsuite to run on >> AMD >> GCN in a standalone (i.e. not offloading) configuration. It assumes you have >> your Dejagnu set up to run binaries

Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-11-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/16/18 9:29 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > This collection of miscellaneous patches configures the testsuite to run on > AMD > GCN in a standalone (i.e. not offloading) configuration. It assumes you have > your Dejagnu set up to run binaries via the gcn-run tool. > > 2018-11-16 Andrew Stubbs

[PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN

2018-11-16 Thread Andrew Stubbs
This collection of miscellaneous patches configures the testsuite to run on AMD GCN in a standalone (i.e. not offloading) configuration. It assumes you have your Dejagnu set up to run binaries via the gcn-run tool. 2018-11-16 Andrew Stubbs Kwok Cheung Yeung Julian Br