On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 21:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 08:57, Matthias Kretz wrote:
>
>> ping. OK to push?
>>
>
> Sorry for the delay - this is OK for trunk.
>
I see a new failure on powerpc64le-linux (gcc112 in the cfarm) after this
commit:
FAIL:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 08:57, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> ping. OK to push?
>
Sorry for the delay - this is OK for trunk.
> On Tuesday, 8 June 2021 14:12:23 CET Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > From: Matthias Kretz
> >
> > Explicitly support use of the stdx::simd implementation in situations
> > where
ping. OK to push?
On Tuesday, 8 June 2021 14:12:23 CET Matthias Kretz wrote:
> From: Matthias Kretz
>
> Explicitly support use of the stdx::simd implementation in situations
> where the user links TUs that were compiled with different -m flags. In
> general, this is always a (quasi) ODR
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:53 PM Matthias Kretz wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 9 June 2021 14:22:00 CEST Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:23 PM Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > > From: Matthias Kretz
> > >
> > > Explicitly support use of the stdx::simd implementation in situations
> > >
On Wednesday, 9 June 2021 14:22:00 CEST Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:23 PM Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > From: Matthias Kretz
> >
> > Explicitly support use of the stdx::simd implementation in situations
> > where the user links TUs that were compiled with different -m flags. In
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:23 PM Matthias Kretz wrote:
>
>
> From: Matthias Kretz
>
> Explicitly support use of the stdx::simd implementation in situations
> where the user links TUs that were compiled with different -m flags. In
> general, this is always a (quasi) ODR violation for inline
From: Matthias Kretz
Explicitly support use of the stdx::simd implementation in situations
where the user links TUs that were compiled with different -m flags. In
general, this is always a (quasi) ODR violation for inline functions
because at least codegen may differ in important ways. However,
