Re: [PATCH 11/24] Disable year 2038 support on 32-bit hosts by default

2023-08-08 Thread Luis Machado via Gcc-patches
On 8/7/23 18:45, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 8/7/23 04:32, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: >> From: Luis Machado >> >> With a recent import of gnulib, code has been pulled that tests and enables >> 64-bit time_t by default on 32-bit hosts that support it. >> >> Although gdb can use the gnuli

Re: [PATCH 11/24] Disable year 2038 support on 32-bit hosts by default

2023-08-07 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 8/7/23 04:32, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: From: Luis Machado With a recent import of gnulib, code has been pulled that tests and enables 64-bit time_t by default on 32-bit hosts that support it. Although gdb can use the gnulib support, bfd doesn't use gnulib and currently does

[PATCH 11/24] Disable year 2038 support on 32-bit hosts by default

2023-08-07 Thread Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches
From: Luis Machado With a recent import of gnulib, code has been pulled that tests and enables 64-bit time_t by default on 32-bit hosts that support it. Although gdb can use the gnulib support, bfd doesn't use gnulib and currently doesn't do these checks. As a consequence, if we have a 32-bit h