> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21]middle-end: [RFC] conditionally support forcing
> > final
> > edge for debugging
> >
> > On Sat, 9 Dec 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> > > Tamar Christina writes:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > &
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 7:38 AM
> To: Richard Sandiford
> Cc: Tamar Christina ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd
> ; j...@ventanamicro.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21]middle-end: [RFC] conditionally support forcin
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Tamar Christina writes:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What do people think about having the ability to force only the latch
> > connected
> > exit as the exit as a param? I.e. what's in the patch but as a param.
> >
> > I found this useful when debugging larg
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi All,
>
> What do people think about having the ability to force only the latch
> connected
> exit as the exit as a param? I.e. what's in the patch but as a param.
>
> I found this useful when debugging large example failures as it tells me where
> I should be looking.
Hi All,
What do people think about having the ability to force only the latch connected
exit as the exit as a param? I.e. what's in the patch but as a param.
I found this useful when debugging large example failures as it tells me where
I should be looking. No hard requirement but just figured I
