> Preserving the sched state across basic blocks for your case works only if
> the BBs are traversed
> with the fall through edges coming first. Is that the case? We probably
> should have a description
> for s390_last_sched_state stating this.
Committed as attached with an additional comment an
> Can't we just set s390_sched_state to s390_last_sched_state in
> s390_sched_init.
Good idea, this simplifies the code quite a bit.
> Preserving the sched state across basic blocks for your case works
> only if the BBs are traversed with the fall through edges coming
> first. Is that the case? W
On 10/11/2017 01:53 PM, Robin Dapp wrote:
> This patch fixes cases where we start a new group although the previous one
> has
> not ended.
>
> Regression tested on s390x.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2017-10-11 Robin Dapp
>
> * config/s390/s390.c (s390_has_ok_fallthru): New function.
>
This patch fixes cases where we start a new group although the previous one has
not ended.
Regression tested on s390x.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-10-11 Robin Dapp
* config/s390/s390.c (s390_has_ok_fallthru): New function.
(s390_sched_score): Temporarily change s390_sched_state.
