On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:36 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 11:40 PM Andrew Pinski
> wrote:
> >
> > Right now we don't print that a DECL_EXPR and we get
> > basically double output of the decls and it looks confusing.
> > This fixes that.
> > for the simple example:
> > `void
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 11:40 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> Right now we don't print that a DECL_EXPR and we get
> basically double output of the decls and it looks confusing.
> This fixes that.
> for the simple example:
> `void foo () { int result = 0;}`
> This gives:
> ```
> {
> int result = 0;
>
Right now we don't print that a DECL_EXPR and we get
basically double output of the decls and it looks confusing.
This fixes that.
for the simple example:
`void foo () { int result = 0;}`
This gives:
```
{
int result = 0;
DECL_EXPR;
}
```
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no re
