On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Andrew Carlotti writes:
> > There was an assumption in some places that the aarch64_fmv_feature_data
> > array contained FEAT_MAX elements. While this assumption held up till
> > now, it is safer and more flexible to use the
Andrew Carlotti writes:
> There was an assumption in some places that the aarch64_fmv_feature_data
> array contained FEAT_MAX elements. While this assumption held up till
> now, it is safer and more flexible to use the array size directly.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
There was an assumption in some places that the aarch64_fmv_feature_data
array contained FEAT_MAX elements. While this assumption held up till
now, it is safer and more flexible to use the array size directly.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (compare_feature_masks):