Re: [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: [arm/mve] Use arm_softfp and arm_hard as needed in MVE tests

2020-04-14 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 10:21, Andre Vieira (lists) < andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> wrote: > On 10/04/2020 14:55, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Some MVE tests explicitly test a -mfloat-abi=hard option, but we need > > to check that the toolchain actually supports it (which may not be

Re: [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: [arm/mve] Use arm_softfp and arm_hard as needed in MVE tests

2020-04-14 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
On 10/04/2020 14:55, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote: Some MVE tests explicitly test a -mfloat-abi=hard option, but we need to check that the toolchain actually supports it (which may not be the case for arm-linux-gnueabi* targets). We also make use of dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve_fp and a

[PATCH 2/5] testsuite: [arm/mve] Use arm_softfp and arm_hard as needed in MVE tests

2020-04-10 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
Some MVE tests explicitly test a -mfloat-abi=hard option, but we need to check that the toolchain actually supports it (which may not be the case for arm-linux-gnueabi* targets). We also make use of dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve_fp and arm_v8_1m_mve instead of duplicating the corresponding options