Re: [PATCH 23/31] VAX: Make `extv' an expander matching the remaining bitfield operations

2020-11-21 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/19/20 8:36 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > We have matching insns defined for `sign_extract' and `zero_extract' > expressions, so make the three named patterns for bitfield operations > consistent and make `extv' an expander rather than an insn taking a > SImode, a QImode, and a SImode

[PATCH 23/31] VAX: Make `extv' an expander matching the remaining bitfield operations

2020-11-19 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
We have matching insns defined for `sign_extract' and `zero_extract' expressions, so make the three named patterns for bitfield operations consistent and make `extv' an expander rather than an insn taking a SImode, a QImode, and a SImode general operand for the LOC, SIZE, and POS operands