On Jan 14, 2015, at 6:52 AM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 14/01/15 11:57, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Ping?
I'm OK with this, but I think you also need a generic testsuite
maintainer to go over the target independent parts.
Ok.
On 14/01/15 11:57, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Ping?
I'm OK with this, but I think you also need a generic testsuite
maintainer to go over the target independent parts.
R.
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Earnshaw
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 2:53 PM
To: Thomas Preud'homme; Tony Wang; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3, ARM, libgcc, ping6] Code size optimization for
the fmul/fdiv and dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
On 14/01/15 11:57, Thomas Preud'homme
, ping6] Code size optimization for
the fmul/fdiv and dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
On 14/01/15 11:57, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Ping?
I'm OK with this, but I think you also need a generic testsuite
maintainer to go over the target independent parts.
R.
-Original Message-
From: gcc
Ping?
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:05 PM
To: Tony Wang; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3,
