Re: [PATCH 3/3] isel: Don't duplicate comparisons for -O0 nor -fno-tree-ter [PR116101]

2024-07-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:37 AM Andrew Pinski wrote: > > While doing cleanups on this code I noticed that we do the duplicate > of comparisons at -O0. For C and C++ code this makes no difference as > the gimplifier never produces COND_EXPR. But it could make a difference > for other front-ends. >

[PATCH 3/3] isel: Don't duplicate comparisons for -O0 nor -fno-tree-ter [PR116101]

2024-07-25 Thread Andrew Pinski
While doing cleanups on this code I noticed that we do the duplicate of comparisons at -O0. For C and C++ code this makes no difference as the gimplifier never produces COND_EXPR. But it could make a difference for other front-ends. Oh and for -fno-tree-ter, duplicating the comparison is just a was