Hi Martin, I think you're the one to CC for this,
as I mentioned in the first email, this has been build tested, however I did
not know if I could test this without a Radeon card. If convenient,
could you or anyone familiar with the setup do a make check-target-libgomp
with this patch series?
Tha
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:22:17PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Hi Martin, I think you're the one to CC for this,
> as I mentioned in the first email, this has been build tested, however I did
> not know if I could test this without a Radeon card. If convenient,
> could you or anyone famili
On 2016/3/25 上午 02:40, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On the whole, I am fine with the patch but there are two issues:
>
> First, and generally, when you change the return type of a function,
> you must document what return values mean in the comment of the
> function. Most importantly, it must be immedi
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 06:26:29PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2016/3/25 上午 02:40, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On the whole, I am fine with the patch but there are two issues:
> >
> > First, and generally, when you change the return type of a function,
> > you must document what return val
On 2016/3/29 09:35 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 06:26:29PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> On 2016/3/25 上午 02:40, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> On the whole, I am fine with the patch but there are two issues:
>>>
>>> First, and generally, when you change the return type of
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 03:38:57PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Hi Martin, the attached patch reverts that queue_callback() change, and adds
> some more descriptions in the comments to reflect the bool return changes.
> Please see if they are acceptable.
>
If the rest of the patch-set is a
