This patch (3rd of 4) contains changes to gcc-interface/Makefile.in and DJGPP own implementation of
system.ads.
ChangeLog entry:
2016-07-30 Andris Pavenis
* ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS): Define for DJGPP target
(EH_MECHANISM): Define to -gcc for DJGPP
* ada/system-dj
> 2016-07-30 Andris Pavenis
>
> * ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS): Define for
> DJGPP target
> (EH_MECHANISM): Define to -gcc for DJGPP
> * ada/system-djgpp.ads: New file
>
> Andris
> +++ b/gcc/ada/system-djgpp.ads
> @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
> +--
On 08/18/2016 12:41 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
2016-07-30 Andris Pavenis
* ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS): Define for
DJGPP target
(EH_MECHANISM): Define to -gcc for DJGPP
* ada/system-djgpp.ads: New file
Andris
+++ b/gcc/ada/system-djgpp.ads
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+
Which exception handling mechanism is used by the DJGPP port?
Is it (GCC) SJLJ?
Arno
On 08/25/2016 12:46 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
Which exception handling mechanism is used by the DJGPP port?
Is it (GCC) SJLJ?
No. Updated to set ZCX_By_Default := true for DJGPP.
New patch attached.
Andris
>From 45d1e01d7b29e88eea85a284733efdd7f38cc604 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andris Pa
> On 08/25/2016 12:46 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> >Which exception handling mechanism is used by the DJGPP port?
> >Is it (GCC) SJLJ?
> No. Updated to set ZCX_By_Default := true for DJGPP.
Well I'm confused now. How could this work before? In other words, has the
target runtime been tested/used by
On 09/04/2016 09:50 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
On 08/25/2016 12:46 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
Which exception handling mechanism is used by the DJGPP port?
Is it (GCC) SJLJ?
No. Updated to set ZCX_By_Default := true for DJGPP.
Well I'm confused now. How could this work before? In other words, ha
> GCC Ada compiler itself uses exceptions.
Yes, but the bootstrap doesn't use system-dgjpp.ads, it uses the generic
system.ads which uses front-end (GNAT) SJLJ, hence my question. Your
answer isn't very reassuring.
Arno
> Attached output is from last test build (r239639 with DJGPP related patches
> applied, last version of patches for Ada).
Very strange error, line 28 of gtype-ada.h is supposed to have a guard for
nodes containing the 'common' structure. Can you post an excerpt of the file?
--
Eric Botcazou
On 09/05/2016 09:42 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Attached output is from last test build (r239639 with DJGPP related patches
applied, last version of patches for Ada).
Very strange error, line 28 of gtype-ada.h is supposed to have a guard for
nodes containing the 'common' structure. Can you post an
On 09/07/2016 08:59 PM, Andris Pavenis wrote:
On 09/05/2016 09:42 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Attached output is from last test build (r239639 with DJGPP related patches
applied, last version of patches for Ada).
Very strange error, line 28 of gtype-ada.h is supposed to have a guard for
nodes cont
> Found that the first revision causing this problem (of course with DJGPP
> related patches applied) is 239113. Native bootstrap with same DJGPP
> related patches applied on top of revision 239112 succeeds without
> problems.
>
> [andris@ap gcc]$ git bisect good
> 4bfa373ed2bfd022628609751ff34b8e
On 09/13/2016 11:39 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Found that the first revision causing this problem (of course with DJGPP
related patches applied) is 239113. Native bootstrap with same DJGPP
related patches applied on top of revision 239112 succeeds without
problems.
[andris@ap gcc]$ git bisect good
On 09/05/2016 08:39 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
GCC Ada compiler itself uses exceptions.
Yes, but the bootstrap doesn't use system-dgjpp.ads, it uses the generic
system.ads which uses front-end (GNAT) SJLJ, hence my question. Your
answer isn't very reassuring.
Tried several test examples which use
I'd like to ping patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00164.html
Additional comments about using ZCX_By_Default := true are in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00845.html
Andris
> I'd like to ping patch
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00164.html
>
> Additional comments about using ZCX_By_Default := true are in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00845.html
Well this patch doesn't inspire lots of confidence since the initial
version had the
On 10/11/2016 11:46 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
I'd like to ping patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00164.html
Additional comments about using ZCX_By_Default := true are in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00845.html
Well this patch doesn't inspire lots of confidenc
17 matches
Mail list logo
