David Malcolm a écrit:
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 11:13 +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
[...]
>> Funny; I first overlooked this comment of you, and then when reading the
>> patch, I asked myself "why keep the existing location_t" ? I mean, in
>> here:
>>
>> /* A preprocessing token. This has b
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 11:13 +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> David Malcolm a écrit:
>
> > This is an updated version of:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00736.html
> >
> > Changes in V2 of the patch:
> > * c_lex_with_flags: don't write through the range ptr if it's
Hello,
David Malcolm a écrit:
> This is an updated version of:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00736.html
>
> Changes in V2 of the patch:
> * c_lex_with_flags: don't write through the range ptr if it's NULL
> * don't add any fields to the C++ frontend's cp_token for now
>
This is an updated version of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00736.html
Changes in V2 of the patch:
* c_lex_with_flags: don't write through the range ptr if it's NULL
* don't add any fields to the C++ frontend's cp_token for now
* libcpp/lex.c: prevent usage of stale/uninit
