Re: [PATCH 3.1/11] Explicitly initialize the macro-generated pass fields (was Re: [PATCH 03/11] Handwritten part of conversion of passes to C++ classes)

2013-08-03 Thread Richard Henderson
On 08/02/2013 02:38 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > OK for trunk? (as part of patches 3-6) Ok.

Re: [PATCH 3.1/11] Explicitly initialize the macro-generated pass fields (was Re: [PATCH 03/11] Handwritten part of conversion of passes to C++ classes)

2013-08-02 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 13:13 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:41 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 07/26/2013 09:04 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > This patch is the hand-written part of the conversion of passes from > > > C structs to C++ classes. It does not work without the subs

[PATCH 3.1/11] Explicitly initialize the macro-generated pass fields (was Re: [PATCH 03/11] Handwritten part of conversion of passes to C++ classes)

2013-08-01 Thread David Malcolm
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:41 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 07/26/2013 09:04 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > > This patch is the hand-written part of the conversion of passes from > > C structs to C++ classes. It does not work without the subsequent > > autogenerated part, which is huge. > [ ... ] > With t