Thanks Kewen.
Given that background, the patch is OK.
paul
> On Jun 16, 2024, at 10:01 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> on 2024/6/14 23:20, Paul Koning wrote:
>> Ok, I understand better now. But if those macros are supposed to be
>> replaced by hook functions, could you make
Hi Paul,
on 2024/6/14 23:20, Paul Koning wrote:
> Ok, I understand better now. But if those macros are supposed to be replaced
> by hook functions, could you make that replacement part of the proposed patch?
The default implementation of the introduced hook mode_for_floating_type
returns
Ok, I understand better now. But if those macros are supposed to be replaced
by hook functions, could you make that replacement part of the proposed patch?
paul
> On Jun 13, 2024, at 11:22 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> on 2024/6/14 04:07, Paul Koning wrote:
>> What is the
Hi Paul,
on 2024/6/14 04:07, Paul Koning wrote:
> What is the effect of this change? The original code intended to have
> "float" mean a 32 bit value, and "double" a 64 bit value. There aren't any
> larger floats, so I defined the long double size as 64 also. Is the right
> answer not to
