On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:25 PM Christoph Müllner
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:45 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:09 AM Christoph Müllner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:10 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> > > >
> > > > LGTM, and could you backport this
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:45 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:09 AM Christoph Müllner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:10 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> > >
> > > LGTM, and could you backport this to the GCC 14 branch as well?
> >
> > Rebased, retested (multilib), fixed an
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:09 AM Christoph Müllner
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:10 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >
> > LGTM, and could you backport this to the GCC 14 branch as well?
>
> Rebased, retested (multilib), fixed an issue related to Zca/Zcd and pushed.
>
> Should the GCC 14 backport
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:10 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> LGTM, and could you backport this to the GCC 14 branch as well?
Rebased, retested (multilib), fixed an issue related to Zca/Zcd and pushed.
Should the GCC 14 backport be posted for review before pushing?
Thanks,
Christoph
>
> On Tue, Jul
LGTM, and could you backport this to the GCC 14 branch as well?
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:50 PM Christoph Müllner
wrote:
>
> The target-arch attribute handling in RISC-V is only a few months old,
> but already saw a rewrite (9941f0295a14), which addressed an important
> issue. This rewrite
The target-arch attribute handling in RISC-V is only a few months old,
but already saw a rewrite (9941f0295a14), which addressed an important
issue. This rewrite introduced a hash table in the backend, which is
used to keep track of target-arch attributes of all functions.
The index of this hash
