On 11/14/22 12:01, Christoph Müllner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:16 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/13/22 16:05, Christoph Muellner wrote:
> From: Christoph Müllner
>
> The current implementation of riscv_block_move_straight() emits
a couple
> of load-store pairs wit
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:16 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 11/13/22 16:05, Christoph Muellner wrote:
> > From: Christoph Müllner
> >
> > The current implementation of riscv_block_move_straight() emits a couple
> > of load-store pairs with maximum width (e.g. 8-byte for RV64).
> > The remainder is ha
On 11/13/22 16:05, Christoph Muellner wrote:
From: Christoph Müllner
The current implementation of riscv_block_move_straight() emits a couple
of load-store pairs with maximum width (e.g. 8-byte for RV64).
The remainder is handed over to move_by_pieces(), which emits code based
target settings
From: Christoph Müllner
The current implementation of riscv_block_move_straight() emits a couple
of load-store pairs with maximum width (e.g. 8-byte for RV64).
The remainder is handed over to move_by_pieces(), which emits code based
target settings like slow_unaligned_access and overlap_op_by_pie