On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:04:01PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:17:48AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > That all sounds great :-) Has this been tested with older binutils, too?
>
> Yes, lots of times. Sometimes by accident when I forgot to install
> a new binutils.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:17:48AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> That all sounds great :-) Has this been tested with older binutils, too?
Yes, lots of times. Sometimes by accident when I forgot to install
a new binutils. :-)
> > +(define_insn "*sibcall_indirect_nonlocal_sysv"
>
> > + (
Hi Alan,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:23:43PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> Finally, the point of the previous patches in this series, support for
> inline PLT calls, keyed off -fno-plt. This emits code using new
> relocations that tie all insns in the sequence together, so that the
> linker can edit
Version 2.
Finally, the point of the previous patches in this series, support for
inline PLT calls, keyed off -fno-plt. This emits code using new
relocations that tie all insns in the sequence together, so that the
linker can edit the sequence back to a direct call should the call
target turn out
Finally, the point of the previous patches in this series, support for
inline PLT calls, keyed off -fno-plt. This emits code using new
relocations that tie all insns in the sequence together, so that the
linker can edit the sequence back to a direct call should the call
target turn out to be local
