Re: [PATCH 7/8] rs6000: vec_neg built-ins wrongly require POWER8

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:50:25AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: > As the subject states. Fixing this is accomplished by moving the built-ins > to the correct stanzas, [altivec] and [vsx]. > > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions. > Is this okay for trunk? Okay for

Re: [PATCH 7/8] rs6000: vec_neg built-ins wrongly require POWER8

Hi Segher, Thanks for all the reviews for this series!  I'd like to gently ping the last two patches. BR, Bill On 1/28/22 11:50 AM, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote: > As the subject states. Fixing this is accomplished by moving the built-ins > to the correct stanzas, [altivec] and [vsx]. >

[PATCH 7/8] rs6000: vec_neg built-ins wrongly require POWER8

As the subject states. Fixing this is accomplished by moving the built-ins to the correct stanzas, [altivec] and [vsx]. Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is this okay for trunk? Thanks, Bill 2022-01-27 Bill Schmidt gcc/ *