On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> This is the patch that richi includes in the PR. There will need to
> be an additional patch to solve an ICE for the AVR backend, as noted
> in the PR, but this is good enough to solve the bad-code generation
> problem for the i386 backen
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 07:17 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the patch that richi includes in the PR. There will need to
>>> be an additional patch to solve an ICE for the AVR backe
On 10/08/2015 07:17 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
This is the patch that richi includes in the PR. There will need to
be an additional patch to solve an ICE for the AVR backend, as noted
in the PR, but this is good enough to solve the bad-code g
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> This is the patch that richi includes in the PR. There will need to
> be an additional patch to solve an ICE for the AVR backend, as noted
> in the PR, but this is good enough to solve the bad-code generation
> problem for the i386 backe
This is the patch that richi includes in the PR. There will need to
be an additional patch to solve an ICE for the AVR backend, as noted
in the PR, but this is good enough to solve the bad-code generation
problem for the i386 backend.
* tree-ssa-address.c (create_mem_ref_raw): Retain the
