Fixed the formatting and committed it to trunk: r215136. Will backport
it to gcc-4_9 branch.
thanks,
David
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 09/09/14 19:45, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Richard, thanks for the review. The revised patch is attached. Is this
>> one OK
On 09/09/14 19:45, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Richard, thanks for the review. The revised patch is attached. Is this
> one OK (after testing is done)?
>
> David
>
>
OK, but ...
> 2014-09-08 Xinliang David Li
>
> PR target/63209
> * config/arm/arm.md (movcond_addsi): Handle
With gcc regression test, no regressions are found.
David
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Richard, thanks for the review. The revised patch is attached. Is this
> one OK (after testing is done)?
>
> David
>
>
> 2014-09-08 Xinliang David Li
>
> PR target/632
Richard, thanks for the review. The revised patch is attached. Is this
one OK (after testing is done)?
David
2014-09-08 Xinliang David Li
PR target/63209
* config/arm/arm.md (movcond_addsi): Handle case where source
and target operands are the same
2014-09-08 Xinlia
On 09/09/14 16:58, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> The attached patch fixed the problem reported in PR63209. The problem
> exists in both gcc4.9 and trunk.
>
> Regression test on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi passes.
>
> Ok for gcc-4.9 and trunk?
>
No, this isn't right. I don't think you need a new pat
The attached patch fixed the problem reported in PR63209. The problem
exists in both gcc4.9 and trunk.
Regression test on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi passes.
Ok for gcc-4.9 and trunk?
(I sent the patch last night, but it got lost somehow)
David
Index: ChangeLog
==
