On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>>>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
This patch refactors struct partition for later distributio
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> This patch refactors struct partition for later distribution. It records
>>> bitmap of data references in struct partitio
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch refactors struct partition for later distribution. It records
>> bitmap of data references in struct partition rather than vertices' data in
>> partition dependence gra
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch refactors struct partition for later distribution. It records
> bitmap of data references in struct partition rather than vertices' data in
> partition dependence graph. It simplifies code as well as enables following
> rewriti
Hi,
This patch refactors struct partition for later distribution. It records
bitmap of data references in struct partition rather than vertices' data in
partition dependence graph. It simplifies code as well as enables following
rewriting.
Bootstrap and test on x86_64 and AArch64. Is it OK?
Tha
