Re: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions in iv base

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > Ping. Ok. Thanks, Richard. > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: >> Hi, >> This is a rework for >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review >> comments

Re: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions in iv base

Ping. On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: > Hi, > This is a rework for > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review > comments addressed. For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of > "(signed T)((unsigned T)base + step))". This

Re: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions in iv base

: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions in iv base Hi, This is a rework for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review comments addressed. For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of (signed T)((unsigned T)base + step

[PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions in iv base

Hi, This is a rework for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review comments addressed. For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of (signed T)((unsigned T)base + step)). This complicates other optimizations/analysis depending on SCEV because it's hard to dive into

RE: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions in iv base

-Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Bin Cheng Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:12 PM To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions in iv base Hi