On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:23 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:25 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:11 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09
Hi H.J,
Sorry that I will be out of office next week, and don't have chance to
reproduce it until back. BTW, does x32 refer to x86 32 bit?
Thanks,
bin
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:23 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:25 AM, H.J. Lu w
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:23 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:25 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:11 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 a
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:25 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:11 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Fe
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:25 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:11 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:52 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:11 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:52 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, bin.cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> Th
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:52 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, bin.cheng wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removi
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:52 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, bin.cheng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
>>> headers/latches in cfg cleanup if possible.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:52 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, bin.cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
>> headers/latches in cfg cleanup if possible. Several tests are broken by
>> this change since cfg cleanup i
Sorry, I didn't test it against logical_op_short_circuit target. I
will look into this PR.
Thanks,
bin
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, bin.cheng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
>> h
Thanks for reporting this, I will look into it.
Thanks,
bin
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:52 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, bin.cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
>> headers/latches in cfg cleanup if possible.
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, bin.cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
> headers/latches in cfg cleanup if possible. Several tests are broken by
> this change since cfg cleanup is shared by all optimizers. Some tests has
> already been fixed by
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, bin.cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
> headers/latches in cfg cleanup if possible. Several tests are broken by
> this change since cfg cleanup is shared by all optimizers. Some tests has
> already b
Cheng
>> Cc: GCC Patches
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Allow cfgcleanup to remove forwarder loop
>> preheaders and latches
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:12 AM, bin.cheng wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removi
Updated as comments.
Thanks,
bin
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:38 PM
> To: Bin Cheng
> Cc: GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Allow cfgcleanup to remove forwarder loop
> p
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:12 AM, bin.cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
> headers/latches in cfg cleanup if possible. Several tests are broken by
> this change since cfg cleanup is shared by all optimizers. Some tests has
> already b
Hi,
This patch is to fix regression reported in PR60280 by removing forward loop
headers/latches in cfg cleanup if possible. Several tests are broken by
this change since cfg cleanup is shared by all optimizers. Some tests has
already been fixed by recent patches, I went through and fixed the oth
17 matches
Mail list logo
