On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> I ran into this when investigating PR82369 which we failed to find base
> object.
> This simple patch tries harder to find base object by expanding base address
> in alloc_iv. In general, we don't want to do aggressive
Hi,
I ran into this when investigating PR82369 which we failed to find base object.
This simple patch tries harder to find base object by expanding base address
in alloc_iv. In general, we don't want to do aggressive expansion, but this
case is fine because finding base object means reduction