On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:23 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> --
> Sender:Richard Biener
> Sent At:2020 Mar. 20 (Fri.) 18:12
> Recipient:bin.cheng
> Cc:Andrew Pinski ; GCC Patches
> Subject:Re: [PATCH PR93674]Avoid introducing IV of
--
Sender:Richard Biener
Sent At:2020 Mar. 20 (Fri.) 18:12
Recipient:bin.cheng
Cc:Andrew Pinski ; GCC Patches
Subject:Re: [PATCH PR93674]Avoid introducing IV of enumeral type in case of
-fstrict-enums
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:27 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> --
> Sender:Richard Biener
> Sent At:2020 Mar. 3 (Tue.) 17:36
> Recipient:Andrew Pinski
> Cc:bin.cheng ; GCC Patches
>
> Subject:Re: [PATCH PR93674]Avoid introducing IV of
--
Sender:Richard Biener
Sent At:2020 Mar. 3 (Tue.) 17:36
Recipient:Andrew Pinski
Cc:bin.cheng ; GCC Patches
Subject:Re: [PATCH PR93674]Avoid introducing IV of enumeral type in case of
-fstrict-enums
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:14
Forwarding to public list.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Bin.Cheng
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH PR93674]Avoid introducing IV of enumeral type in
case of -fstrict-enums
To: Richard Biener
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:36 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:14 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:40 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:07 AM bin.cheng
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > This is a simple fix for PR93674. It adds cand carefully for enumeral
> > > type iv_use in
> > >
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:40 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:07 AM bin.cheng wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > This is a simple fix for PR93674. It adds cand carefully for enumeral type
> > iv_use in
> > case of -fstrict-enums, it also avoids computing, replacing iv_use with the
> >
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:07 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This is a simple fix for PR93674. It adds cand carefully for enumeral type
> iv_use in
> case of -fstrict-enums, it also avoids computing, replacing iv_use with the
> candidate
> so that no IV of enumeral type is introduced with
Hi,
This is a simple fix for PR93674. It adds cand carefully for enumeral type
iv_use in
case of -fstrict-enums, it also avoids computing, replacing iv_use with the
candidate
so that no IV of enumeral type is introduced with -fstrict-enums option.
Testcase is also added. Bootstrap and test on