On Tue, 13 Dec 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> If the Rust folks are willing to use Sphinx, then yes, I'm going to
> prepare a common infrastructure (baseconf.py, common license files and a
> common Makefile). So something similar to what I prepared for the Sphinx
> conversion that didn't make it.
On 12/13/22 02:43, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 12/6/22 11:14, arthur.co...@embecosm.com wrote:
>>> |We still need to write out a documentation section, but these READMEs will
>>> help in the meantime.|
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Just a quick comment: The Sphinx c
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 12/6/22 11:14, arthur.co...@embecosm.com wrote:
> > |We still need to write out a documentation section, but these READMEs will
> > help in the meantime.|
>
> Hello.
>
> Just a quick comment: The Sphinx conversion didn't make it for all GCC
> manual
On 12/6/22 11:14, arthur.co...@embecosm.com wrote:
> |We still need to write out a documentation section, but these READMEs will
> help in the meantime.|
Hello.
Just a quick comment: The Sphinx conversion didn't make it for all GCC manuals.
However,
you can still use Sphinx for a newly created
From: Philip Herron
We still need to write out a documentation section, but these READMEs will
help in the meantime.
---
gcc/rust/CONTRIBUTING.md | 130 +++
gcc/rust/README.md | 264 +++
gcc/rust/logo.png| Bin 0 -> 70864 bytes
3
