Re: [PATCH Take #2] x86_64: Expand ashrv1ti (and PR target/102986)

2021-11-01 Thread Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:43 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:27:12AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > > Also, I wonder for all these patterns (previously and now added), > > > shouldn't > > > they have && TARGET_64BIT in conditions? I mean, we don't really support > > > scalar

Re: [PATCH Take #2] x86_64: Expand ashrv1ti (and PR target/102986)

2021-11-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:27:12AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > Also, I wonder for all these patterns (previously and now added), shouldn't > > they have && TARGET_64BIT in conditions? I mean, we don't really support > > scalar TImode for ia32, but VALID_SSE_REG_MODE includes V1TImode and while >

Re: [PATCH Take #2] x86_64: Expand ashrv1ti (and PR target/102986)

2021-11-01 Thread Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 11:02 AM Roger Sayle wrote: > > > Very many thanks to Jakub for proof-reading my patch, catching my silly > GNU-style > mistakes and making excellent suggestions. This revised patch incorporates > all of > his feedback, and has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make

[PATCH Take #2] x86_64: Expand ashrv1ti (and PR target/102986)

2021-10-31 Thread Roger Sayle
Very many thanks to Jakub for proof-reading my patch, catching my silly GNU-style mistakes and making excellent suggestions. This revised patch incorporates all of his feedback, and has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap and make -k check with no new failures. 2021-10-31 Rog