Hi,
On 2023-04-26 17:35, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi Jeff,
on 2023/1/4 14:51, Jiufu Guo wrote:
Hi,
Compare with previous version, this patch updates the comments only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608293.html
For a complicate 64bit constant, below is one instruction-sequen
Hi Jeff,
on 2023/1/4 14:51, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Compare with previous version, this patch updates the comments only.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608293.html
>
> For a complicate 64bit constant, below is one instruction-sequence to
> build:
> lis 9,0x800
Hi,
I would ping this patch for stage1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609373.html
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)
Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ping this patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609373.html
>
> BR,
> Jeff (Jiufu)
>
Hi,
I would like to ping this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609373.html
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)
Jiufu Guo writes:
> Hi,
>
> Compare with previous version, this patch updates the comments only.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608293.html
>
> Fo
Hi,
Compare with previous version, this patch updates the comments only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608293.html
For a complicate 64bit constant, below is one instruction-sequence to
build:
lis 9,0x800a
ori 9,9,0xabcd
sldi 9,9,32
oris 9,