Hi,
"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> on 2022/9/7 15:08, Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the issue in PR106460, a rtx 'high:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("var_48")' is tried
>> to store into constant pool and ICE occur. But actually, this rtx represents
>> partial address and can not be
Hi Jeff,
on 2022/9/7 15:08, Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the issue in PR106460, a rtx 'high:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("var_48")' is tried
> to store into constant pool and ICE occur. But actually, this rtx represents
> partial address and can not be put into a .rodata section.
>
> Thi
Hi,
Gentle ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601190.html
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)
Jiufu Guo writes:
> Hi,
>
> As the issue in PR106460, a rtx 'high:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("var_48")' is tried
> to store into constant pool and ICE occur. But actually, this rtx represents
> part
Hi,
As the issue in PR106460, a rtx 'high:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("var_48")' is tried
to store into constant pool and ICE occur. But actually, this rtx represents
partial address and can not be put into a .rodata section.
This patch updates rs6000_cannot_force_const_mem to return true for rtx(s) with
