>> Juzhe mentioned he doesn't want to commit this before
>> all/most bugs are addresses anyway, right?
Yes.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-08-28 22:27
To: Kito Cheng; Juzhe-Zhong
CC: rdapp.gcc; gcc-patches; kito.cheng
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] RISC-V: Enable vec_i
On 8/28/23 08:27, Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches wrote:
LGTM from my side, but I would like to wait Robin is ok too
In principle I'm OK with it as well, realizing we will still need to fine-tune
a lot here anyway. For now, IMHO it's good to have some additional test
coverage
in the vector
> LGTM from my side, but I would like to wait Robin is ok too
In principle I'm OK with it as well, realizing we will still need to fine-tune
a lot here anyway. For now, IMHO it's good to have some additional test
coverage
in the vector space but we should not expect every test to be correct/a
LGTM from my side, but I would like to wait Robin is ok too
Juzhe-Zhong 於 2023年8月28日 週一，19:43寫道：
> XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-12.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER
> LOOP VECTORIZED." 1
> XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-16.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER
> LOOP VECTORIZED." 1
>
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-12.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP
VECTORIZED." 1
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-16.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP
VECTORIZED." 1
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-17.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP
VECTORIZED." 1
XPASS:
