On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 01:43:41PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 02:35:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 08:40:36PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\m__divtc3\M} } } */
> >
> > It might well be that we ca
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 01:43:41PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> I think we will need backports for GCC 12. The issue exists in GCC 11, but I
> don't think that GCC 11 can really work on systems with IEEE long double,
> since
> a lot of the stuff to really finish up the support was not in GCC
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 02:35:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 08:40:36PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > PR target/109067
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (create_complex_muldiv): Delete.
> > (init_float128_ieee): Delete code to switch complex mu
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 08:40:36PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> PR target/109067
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (create_complex_muldiv): Delete.
> (init_float128_ieee): Delete code to switch complex multiply and divide
> for long double.
> (complex_multiply_built
This patch reworks how the complex multiply and divide built-in functions are
done. Previously GCC created built-in declarations for doing long double
complex
multiply and divide when long double is IEEE 128-bit. However, it did not
support __ibm128 complex multiply and divide if long double is
