Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Stefan,
>> >>
>> >> on 2023/8/15 02:51, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
>> >> > Hi everyone,
>> >> >
>> >> > I have bootstrapped and reg
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> on 2023/8/15 02:51, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> >> > Hi everyone,
> >> >
> >> > I have bootstrapped and regtested the patch below on s390. For
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> on 2023/8/15 02:51, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I have bootstrapped and regtested the patch below on s390. For the
>> > 64-bit target I do not see any changes regarding the te
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> on 2023/8/15 02:51, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have bootstrapped and regtested the patch below on s390. For the
> > 64-bit target I do not see any changes regarding the testsuite. For the
> > 31-bit targe
Hi Stefan,
on 2023/8/15 02:51, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have bootstrapped and regtested the patch below on s390. For the
> 64-bit target I do not see any changes regarding the testsuite. For the
> 31-bit target I see the following failures:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/
Hi everyone,
I have bootstrapped and regtested the patch below on s390. For the
64-bit target I do not see any changes regarding the testsuite. For the
31-bit target I see the following failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-14.c (internal compiler error: in require,
at machmode.h:313)
F
.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Kewen.Lin
> Date: 2023-08-14 20:45
> To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> CC: Robin Dapp; richard.sandiford; rguenther; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST
> vectorization
p; richard.sandiford; rguenther; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST
vectorization
Hi Juzhe,
on 2023/8/14 20:08, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> Hi, Kewin.
>
> Could you test 'can_vec_extract_var_idx_p' and send V5 patch when you pa
Hi Juzhe,
on 2023/8/14 20:08, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> Hi, Kewin.
>
> Could you test 'can_vec_extract_var_idx_p' and send V5 patch when you pass
> the testing?
The below diff was bootstrapped and regress-tested on Power10 LE. Comparing to
the
previous v4, the only changes should be the p
T: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST
vectorization
Hi Robin,
on 2023/8/14 16:58, Robin Dapp wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
>> I did a bootstrapping and regression testing on Power10 (LE) and found a lot
>> of failures.
>
> I think the problem is that just like for vec_set
Richard.
> Thanks.
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Kewen.Lin
> Date: 2023-08-14 17:19
> To: Robin Dapp
> CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford; rguenther; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST
>
enough and remove
convert_optab_handler (vec_extract_optab,... check.
Looking forward Richi's more comments.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kewen.Lin
Date: 2023-08-14 17:19
To: Robin Dapp
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford; rguenther; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4]
Hi Robin,
on 2023/8/14 16:58, Robin Dapp wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
>> I did a bootstrapping and regression testing on Power10 (LE) and found a lot
>> of failures.
>
> I think the problem is that just like for vec_set we're expecting
> the vec_extract expander not to fail. It is probably passed not
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023, Robin Dapp wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> > I did a bootstrapping and regression testing on Power10 (LE) and found a
> > lot of failures.
>
> I think the problem is that just like for vec_set we're expecting
> the vec_extract expander not to fail. It is probably passed not a
> con
Hi Kewen,
> I did a bootstrapping and regression testing on Power10 (LE) and found a lot
> of failures.
I think the problem is that just like for vec_set we're expecting
the vec_extract expander not to fail. It is probably passed not a
const int here anymore and therefore fails to expand?
can_
-
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
>
> *From:* Richard Biener <mailto:rguent...@suse.de>
> *Date:* 2023-08-14 14:53
> *To:* Ju-Zhe Zhong <mailto:juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>
> *CC:* gcc-patches <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; richard.sandiford
> <mai
Thanks Richi.
CC kewen to see whether this patch is suitable for powerpc and s390.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-08-14 14:53
To: Ju-Zhe Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST
vectorization
On Fri
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch add support live vectorization by VEC_EXTRACT for LEN loop control.
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Consider this following case:
>
> #include
>
> #define EXTRACT_LAST(TYPE)
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
Hi, Richard and Richi.
This patch add support live vectorization by VEC_EXTRACT for LEN loop control.
Consider this following case:
#include
#define EXTRACT_LAST(TYPE) \
TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) \
test_##TYPE (TYPE *x, int n, T
19 matches
Mail list logo
